Boozhy has held a fairly candid discussion of the Federal Government's refusal to allow California to pass stricter air quality laws than the EPA requires, so imagine how happy we were when we read the following headline in the LA Times:
Senate panel overturns EPA on state's effort to curb greenhouse gas
The fact that the Senate was taking up the fight to overturn the EPA and W's block of California's push to curb greenhouse emissions is commendable. But as we read the article we realize it's actually more of the same in the Senate, a whole lot of posturing and no real action. The LA Times explains that while the panel voted to turn over the EPA's block:
Boxer said that she wouldn't push for full Senate consideration of the legislation because President Bush would veto it. Plus the Senate already has a busy schedule, she said, including planned consideration in June of global warming legislation that her committee is writing. Still, "This shows that the environment committee, on a bipartisan vote, stood up for the California waiver," Boxer said.
Boxer chalks it up as a victory, but we beg the question: And that Pyrrhic victory and colossal waste of time helps who?